Mattarollo et al v. Branch Banking and Trust Co et al
Filing
38
ORDER LIFTING STAY. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/15/2014. (khm)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00063-MR-DLH
CHRIS MATTAROLLO and TINA
MATTAROLLO,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
)
CO. and PAM MURAS,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Notice Regarding Actions
of Bankruptcy Trustee [Doc. 37].
In response to the Court’s Order of December 3, 2013 [Doc. 35], the
Plaintiffs have filed a report advising of the Bankruptcy Trustee’s
determination to abandon any and all interest in the claims asserted by the
Plaintiffs in this action. The Plaintiffs further submit an Order granting them
a discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727.
When a claim is abandoned by the trustee, the claim ceases to be a
part of the bankruptcy estate and “reverts to the debtor and stands as if no
bankruptcy petition was filed.” Dewsnup v. Timm, 908 F.2d 588, 590 (10th
Cir. 1990).
In light of the Bankruptcy Trustee’s abandonment of the
Plaintiffs’ claims, the Court will lift the stay of this action so as to permit the
prosecution of such claims.
Further, because the Plaintiffs have now received a discharge, the
automatic stay of the Defendants’ counterclaims is now lifted.
See 11
U.S.C. § 362(c)(2)(C).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the stay of this action is lifted
with respect to all claims and counterclaims pending in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 15, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?