Mattarollo et al v. Branch Banking and Trust Co et al

Filing 38

ORDER LIFTING STAY. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/15/2014. (khm)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00063-MR-DLH CHRIS MATTAROLLO and TINA MATTAROLLO, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST ) CO. and PAM MURAS, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Notice Regarding Actions of Bankruptcy Trustee [Doc. 37]. In response to the Court’s Order of December 3, 2013 [Doc. 35], the Plaintiffs have filed a report advising of the Bankruptcy Trustee’s determination to abandon any and all interest in the claims asserted by the Plaintiffs in this action. The Plaintiffs further submit an Order granting them a discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727. When a claim is abandoned by the trustee, the claim ceases to be a part of the bankruptcy estate and “reverts to the debtor and stands as if no bankruptcy petition was filed.” Dewsnup v. Timm, 908 F.2d 588, 590 (10th Cir. 1990). In light of the Bankruptcy Trustee’s abandonment of the Plaintiffs’ claims, the Court will lift the stay of this action so as to permit the prosecution of such claims. Further, because the Plaintiffs have now received a discharge, the automatic stay of the Defendants’ counterclaims is now lifted. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(2)(C). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the stay of this action is lifted with respect to all claims and counterclaims pending in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: March 15, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?