Hall v. Hillen
ORDER that [Doc. 15] Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and [Doc. 11] memorandum of law in support thereof are hereby STRICKEN. Defendant may file a motion and brief which comply with the requirements of this Court on or before October 6, 2014. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/3/14. (khm)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
BRYSON CITY DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 2:13-cv-00042-MR-DLH
CHRISTOPHER G. HALL,
WALTER R. HILLEN,
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
On October 1, 2014, the Defendant filed a Motion for Summary
Judgment [Doc. 15], along with a memorandum of law in support thereof
[Doc. 11]. The brief filed in support of the Defendant’s motion, however,
fails to comply with this Court’s Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan,
which requires that briefs must be in at least 14 point type. [Doc. 4 at 5].
Accordingly, the Defendant’s Motion and supporting memorandum will be
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment [Doc. 15] and the memorandum of law filed in support
thereof [Doc. 11] are hereby STRICKEN. The Defendant may file a motion
and brief which comply with the requirements of this Court on or before
October 6, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?