Nautilus Insurance Company v. Smoky Mtn Construction Co. et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 15 Motion to Compel; granting 16 Motion for Leave to File Response to Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 05/14/2015. (klb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BRYSON CITY DIVISION 2:14cv49 MAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SMOKEY MTN CONSTRUCTION ) CO., PATRICK BRAY, and ) MARGARET O’BANNION, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER Pending before the Court is the Motion to Compel [# 15] and Motion for Leave to File Response to Motion to Compel [# 16]. Plaintiff moves to compel Defendants to provide their initial disclosures and to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. Defendants failed to file a timely response to the Motion to Compel. Accordingly, Defendants moved for leave to file a response out of time. Defendants included their response to the Motion to Compel in their Motion for Leave to File Response to Motion to Compel [# 16]. In their Response to the Motion to Compel, Defendants agree that Plaintiff is entitled to an Order compelling Defendants to fully respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests and to provide initial disclosures. -1- Upon a review of the parties’ pleadings, the record, and the relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS the Motion for Leave to File Response to Motion to Compel [# 16]. The Court also GRANTS the Motion to Compel [# 15]. Defendants shall have ten (10) days from the entry of this Order to provide Plaintiff with initial disclosures and to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. The Court notes that the Court would have awarded Plaintiff its fees, including attorney’s fees, in bringing the Motion to Compel, but Plaintiff specifically stated in its motion that it was not seeking an award of costs and fees. Signed: May 14, 2015 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?