Conyers v. USA

Filing 2

ORDER dismissing without prejudice 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Signed by Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/6/07. (com)

Download PDF
Conyers v. USA Doc. 2 Case 3:07-cv-00378-FDW Document 2 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:07CV378-1-W 3:07CR57-W RICK CONYERS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Petitioner's Motion to Correct Sentence, filed August 17, 2007. Petitioner asserts in the present Motion that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his revocation proceeding. Because Petitioner is attacking the validity of his sentence by asserting an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, this Court will treat his motion as Motion to Vacate, Correct, or Set Aside pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.1 A review of the record , however, reveals that Petitioner has directly appealed his sentence to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (case no. 07-4683). As Petitioner's appeal is still pending, a Motion to Vacate is premature. No notice of this conversion is required because this re-characterization will not have an adverse impact on Petitioner. See United States v. Emmanuel, 288 F.3d 644, 650 (4th Cir. 2002). Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are typically properly brought in Motions to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. See United States v.King, 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir. 1997). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00378-FDW Document 2 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 2 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Correct Sentence which is construed as a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence is DISMISSED without prejudice as premature. Signed: September 6, 2007 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?