Shenoy v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al

Filing 132

ORDER: Defendant must file and serve its Reply to Plaintiff's Consolidated Memorandum of Law Regarding Discovery Motion is extended by 4 days. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/5/11. (com)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Civil Action No: 3:08-CV-00125-GCM
B. VITTAL SHENOY, M.D.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL
AUTHORITY, d/b/a CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM ,
MERCY HEALTH SERVICES, INC ., MERCY HOSPITAL, INC .,
JAMES E.S. HYNES, MICHAEL C. TARWATER , PAUL S.
FRANZ, C. CURTIS COPENHAVER , WILLIAM K. BROWN ,
DENNIS J. PHILLIPS, CAROLINAS PATHOLOGY GROUP,
P.A., EDWARD H. LIPFORD , M.D., MARIE-CLAIRE C.
MARROUM , M.D., FILMON M. SEXTON , M.D. and
SANFORD P. BENJAMIN , M.D.,
Defendants.

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, and with Plaintiff’s consent, the period within
which Defendant The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority (“CMHA”) must file
and serve its Reply to Plaintiff’s Consolidated Memorandum of Law Regarding
Discovery Motions (Doc. 129) is extended by four (4) days, up to and including August
5, 2011.
Signed: August 5, 2011