Shenoy v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al

Filing 65

ORDER granting extension of time to reply re 63 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by B. Vittal Shenoy. The time in which Defendants may reply shall be extended up to and including December 18,2008. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/5/08. (dtr)

C-1111431v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No: 3:08CV125 B. VITTAL SHENOY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, dba CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SY STEM , MERCY HEALTH SERVICES, INC., MERCY HO SPITA L, INC., JAMES E.S. HYNES, MICHAEL C. TA R W A TER , PAUL S. FRANZ, C. CURTIS COPENH A V ER , WILLIAM K. BROWN, DENNIS J. PH ILLIPS, CAROLINAS PATHOLOGY GROUP, P.A., ED W A R D H. LIPFORD, M.D., MARIE-CLAIRE C. MA R R O U M , M.D., FILMON M. SEXTON, M.D., AND SA N FO R D P. BENJAMIN, M.D., Defendants. Upon the Motion of Defendants to extend the time in which they may reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to CHS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and CPG Defendants' Amended and Renewed Motion to Dismiss, for good cause shown and with Plaintiff's consent, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the time in which Defendants may reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to CHS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and CPG Defendants' Amended and Renewed Motion to Dismiss, shall be extended up to and including December 18, 2008. Signed: December 5, 2008

ORDER