Olympus Managed Health Care, Inc. et al v. American Housecall Physicians, Inc. et al

Filing 105

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 101 Motion to Compel as set forth in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/28/2011. (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:08CV532-RJC-DSC OLYMPUS MANAGED HEALTH CARE, INC. and OLYMPUS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC., ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) AMERICAN HOUSECALL ) PHYSICIANS, INC., and ) JONATHAN MCGUIRE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) and ) ______________________________) ) AMERICAN HOUSECALL ) PHYSICIANS, INC., f/k/a ) INROOMMD, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, and ) Counterclaimant ) ) v. ) ) RONALD A. DAVIS and ) STEVEN W. JACOBSON, ) ) Third-Party Defendants ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court once again on a discovery issue , Defendant American Housecall Physicians, Inc.’s “Motion to Compel ...” (document #101) filed October 18, 2011, and the parties’ associated briefs and exhibits. See documents ## 102-104.1 This Motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and is now ripe for the Court’s consideration. A detailed discussion of the factual background and procedural history in this matter is contained in the Court’s “Memorandum and Order” (document #60) (denying Third-Party Defendants’ “Motion to Compel (document #54)); “Memorandum and Order” (document #49) (granting in part and denying in part Defendant American Housecall Physicians, Inc.’s “Motion to Compel” (document #45)); and “Memorandum and Recommendation” (document #36) (recommending Third-Party Defendants’ ‘Motion to Dismiss” (document #22) be granted in part and denied in part). The Court has carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions and concludes that Defendant’s Motion to Compel should be granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to respond to Defendant Jonathan McGuire’s First Set of Interrogatories is granted as to Interrogatory Number Two only. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to produce documents is granted as to Request for Production Number Two, but only as pertaining to Defendant Jonathan McGuire’s Interrogatory Number Two, and is also granted as to Requests for Production Numbers Three, Four and TwentyFour. 3. Defendant’s Motion is denied in all other respects. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant American Housecall Physicians, Inc.’s “Motion to Compel ...” (document 1 This is the fourth Motion to Compel filed in this case and the second filed by Defendant. The other Motions to Compel were filed by the Third-Party Defendants. 2 #101) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified above. 2. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to serve complete responses to Interrogatory Number Two of Defendant Jonathan McGuire’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production Number Two (only as pertaining to Interrogatory Number Two), Three, Four and Twenty-Four of Defendant American Housecall Physicians, Inc.’s Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents within fifteen (15) days of this Memorandum and Order. 3. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum and Order to counsel for the parties; and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr. SO ORDERED. Signed: November 28, 2011 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?