Haggins v. Mercy Hospital et al

Filing 32

ORDER re 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Responses due by 1/28/2010.). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/14/2010. (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:09-cv-78-GCM MARY LOUIES HAGGINS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER-MERCY Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THIS MATTER is before the court upon a Complaint filed by Plaintiff pro se. Defendant has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. It appears that Defendant may be entitled to summary judgment. Therefore, the Plaintiff is directed to file a response as described below: TO THE PLAINTIFF, MARY LOUIES HAGGINS, READ THE FOLLOWING VERY CAREFULLY: You are to file a brief written argument opposing the Defendant's brief supporting the Motion for Summary Judgment. This argument must respond to the substantive arguments in Defendant's motion. Within fourteen days of the date of entry of this Order, the Plaintiff must submit the brief or request an extension of the deadline. You are hereby advised that you have fourteen (14) days from the filing of this Order in which to file your response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. If you fail to respond to this motion, the court will proceed to decide the matter. A copy of the response must be served on 1 the Defendant and a certificate of service must be filed with the court showing that a copy has been sent to counsel for the Defendant. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff has fourteen (14) days from the filing of this Order in which to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. The Clerk is specifically directed to send Plaintiff's copy by certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed: January 14, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?