White v. Smereka et al

Filing 83

ORDER denying 81 Motion for Reconsideration ("Bringing It Again- Doc. No. 79 For Correction of Errors/Affidavit"). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/23/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-CV-257-FDW-DCK
VICTOR B. WHITE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
FNU SMEREKA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Plaintiff, Victor B. White ... “Bringing
It Again - Doc. No. 79 For Correction Of Error(s)/Affidavit” (Document No. 81) filed August 23,
2011. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the
record, the undersigned will deny the motion.
Although it is again difficult to determine exactly what relief the pro se Plaintiff seeks, it
appears that he is requesting reconsideration of the undersigned’s previous “Order” (Document No.
80) denying “Plaintiff, Victor B. White’s Motion To Correct Clerical And/Or U.S. District Court’s
Error” (Document No. 79). The instant motion fails to shed any additional light that clarifies
Plaintiff’s alleged error(s). Liberally construed, Plaintiff’s motion may seek to appeal and/or relitigate issues already decided by this Court, or in North Carolina state court. The instant motion,
however, fails to adequately explain or support any need to reconsider the Court’s previous Order,
or to clearly or specifically identify “any error, clerical, judicial, or otherwise in the disposition of
this case.” (Document No. 80).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Plaintiff, Victor B. White ... “Bringing It Again Doc. No. 79 For Correction Of Error(s)/Affidavit” (Document No. 81) is DENIED.

Signed: August 23, 2011

2