Rivas v. United States of America

Filing 5

ORDER re 4 MOTION for Reconsideration re 2 Order on Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), or alternatively, MOTION for Certificate of Appealability. (Government's Response to Motion due by 12/4/2009.). Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 11/3/09. (gpb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Case No. 3:09cv429 [Criminal Case No. 3:08cr55] ) RAFAEL WILFREDO RIVAS, ) ) Petitioner, ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATED OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent.) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Petition to Vacate Conviction and Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, or alternatively, Application for a Certificate of Appealability Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) [Doc. 4]. The Court finds that the Government should respond to the motion and specifically, should address Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004); United States v. Fernandez-Cruz, 2009 WL 3488352, and United States v. Venancio-Dominguez, F.Supp.2d , 2009 WL 3234217 (E.D.Va. 2009). The Government should also clarify for the record in this matter whether the discovery in the underlying criminal case contained evidence that the Defendant knew that the means of identification which he possessed belonged to another person. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that on or before thirty (30) days from entry of this Order, the Government shall file response. Signed: November 3, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?