Chubirko v. Better Business Bureau of Southern Piedmont, Inc et al

Filing 142

ORDER finding as moot 23 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding as moot 57 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 63 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 5/19/2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 3:09-cv-00502-FDW-DLH JOHN CHUBIRKO, Plaintiff, v. BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF SOUTHERN PIEDMONT, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte following the Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to the following Defendants: Rick Jackson, Greater Media, Inc., Peter H. Smyth, Edward R. Nolan, Jr., Ellen J. Rubin, Richard D. Feinblatt, Milford K. Smith, Joseph McKevitz, Bryant Boyington, Heidi A. Raphael, Buzz Knight, Tom Bender, Peter Gilchrist, and Neilsen Online Strategic Services. (Doc. No. 113). Subsequently, the Clerk terminated those identified Defendants in accordance with the voluntary dismissal. Since certain Defendants are no longer parties, the Clerk is directed to terminate the following motions as moot: "Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Peter Gilchrist" (Doc. No. 23); "Motion to Strike [23] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by John Chubirko" (Doc. No. 57); "Motion to Dismiss by Tom Bender, Bryant Boyington, Richard D. Feinblatt, Greater Media, Inc., Rick Jackson, Buzz Knight, Joseph McKevitz, Edward R. Nolan, Jr., Heidi A. Raphael, Ellen J. Rubin, Milford K. Smith, Peter H. Smyth." (Doc. No. 63). The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at 1362 Poplar Glen Drive, Kannapolis, NC 28083, which is Plaintiff's address of record, and to counsel for the Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: May 19, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?