Turner et al v. Taser International, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 Motion for Production of Seized Evidence for Testing and Analysis. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/29/10. (gpb)

Download PDF
Turner et al v. Taser International, Inc. Doc. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:10CV125-RJC-DCK TAMMY LOU FONTENOT, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of DARRYL Wayne Turner, deceased, Plaintiff, vs. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Defendant TASER International, Inc. ("TASER") seeks an Order to secure the release of samples, believed to be marijuana, for testing and analysis (Doc No. 26). Specifically, TASER requests that upon reasonable notice and within five days thereof, appropriately sized samples sufficient for testing of evidence be produced by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department (CMPD) to the lab(s) or research facilit(ies) designated by either or both parties to conduct testing and analysis of the samples submitted. These samples were seized by CMPD, a nonparty hereto, during its investigation in Case No. 20080320130600, and are retained by CMPD under evidence Control No. 200810717, but are no longer of any evidentiary value to CMPD. Thus, CMPD consents to the release of such samples pursuant to court order. Moreover, Plaintiff Tammy Lou Fontenot, as Administratrix of the Estate of Darryl Wayne Turner, does not oppose Defendant's motion. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: CMPD, shall, upon reasonable notice and within five (5) days thereof, produce to the Dockets.Justia.com lab(s) or research facilit(ies) designated by either or both parties, appropriate sized samples sufficient for testing of evidence seized by CMPD during its investigation in Case No. 20080320130600, believed to be marijuana, and retained by CMPD under evidence Control No. 200810717. SO ORDERED. Signed: November 29, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?