Hardin v. Kateh et al

Filing 38

ORDER STAYING CASE pending disposition of Defendant's renewed Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/15/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:10-cv-260-FDW-DSC SHIRLEY R. HARDIN, Plaintiff, vs. FRANCIS KATEH, and ANSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte regarding the status of this case. On December 15, 2010, Defendant moved to dismiss pro se Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. No. 14). Because this motion was made subsequent to the parties’ Rule 26(f) initial attorneys’ conference, the Court stayed the deadlines of the case pending disposition of Defendant’s motion. (Doc. No. 20). In the course of responding to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff raised new claims not contained in her Complaint and moved to dismissed a number of claims. The Court converted Plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition to Defendant’s motion into an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 27), denied as moot Defendant’s motion (Doc. No. 31), and lifted the stay in the case after issuing new deadlines (Doc. No. 32). Defendant now renews its Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). (Doc. No. 33). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to § 3(c)(i) of this Court’s Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management (3:07-mc-47, Doc. No. 2-4), all deadlines and proceedings in this case are hereby STAYED pending disposition of Defendant’s renewed Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff at her address of record, 177 Anson County High School Road, Pinebluff Apartment #205, Wadesboro, NC 28170, and to counsel for Defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: April 15, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?