Nguyen v. Killian

Filing 16

ORDER: The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 4/17/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:10-cv-436-RJC HUNG VAN NGUYEN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) J.M. KILLIAN, Warden, FCI Otisville, ) Otisville, New York, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) ORDER This Court previously dismissed Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as untimely. (Doc. No. 14). Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, this Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000) (in order to satisfy § 2253(c) when court denies relief on procedural grounds, a petitioner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right). Signed: April 17, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?