LendingTree, LLC v. Zillow, Inc. et al

Filing 462

ORDER granting in part 461 Motion to Compel. Defendant Zillow, Inc. shall file a response on or before 12:00pm, January 29, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/24/2014. (chh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-439-FDW-DCK LENDINGTREE, LLC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ZILLOW, INC., Defendant. ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Plaintiff LendingTree, LLC’s Motion To Compel Updated ‘New Request Count’ Data From Defendant Zillow, Inc. And Motion For Expedited Briefing (Document No. 461) filed January 23, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion, in part. Under the circumstances, the Court will require Defendant Zillow, Inc. (“Zillow”) to file an expedited response. Zillow’s response should, inter alia, address LendingTree, LLC’s pending motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e), Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a) and (c)(1), and the “Claim Construction Scheduling Order” (Document No. 75, p.3), as well as any other persuasive authority that might provide guidance here. The Court is particularly interested in the whether the timing of the pending motion, and the timeliness of the parties’ supplementations to date, support Plaintiff’s “…Motion To Compel...” (Document No. 461). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Plaintiff LendingTree, LLC’s Motion To Compel Updated ‘New Request Count’ Data From Defendant Zillow, Inc. And Motion For Expedited Briefing (Document No. 461) is GRANTED, in part. Defendant Zillow, Inc. shall file a response on or before 12:00 p.m., January 29, 2014. SO ORDERED. Signed: January 24, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?