Mason et al v. Health Management Associates, Inc. et al

Filing 332

ORDER that this matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel In Camera Review and Defendants Notice of Submission of Documents for In Camera Review. (Doc. Nos. 299, 324). For the reasons stated herein, the Court will not compel the production of the submitted documents. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 12/21/2022. (brl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-00472-KDB THOMAS L. MASON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. ORDER HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC, ET AL., Defendants. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel In Camera Review and Defendants’ Notice of Submission of Documents for In Camera Review. (Doc. Nos. 299, 324). The Court has carefully reviewed the submitted documents and has held a telephonic conference on December 21, 2022, to question Defense counsel about the submitted documents. For the reasons briefly discussed below, the Court will not compel the production of the submitted documents. The Court granted Plaintiffs’ Motion for in camera review at Plaintiffs’ request to verify the privileged nature of the documents as represented by Defendants. After its thorough review, which included the substance of documents that may not even have been in dispute, the Court has determined that the documents submitted need not be produced because they are both or either irrelevant and/or privileged. Specifically, the Defendants submitted various compliance reports, which contained both privileged and non-privileged entries. (See Docs. 2217, 5529, 8446, 8847). While the privileged portions of these reports could be redacted with some effort, the Court finds that both the privileged 1 Case 3:10-cv-00472-KDB Document 332 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 2 and non-privileged entries in the reports are irrelevant to this matter, and the Court will not compel the disclosure of irrelevant documents. Besides these reports, the other documents submitted to the Court contain communications by counsel or communications sent either to or from counsel about employment matters at the various hospitals HMA operated. As such, these documents are clearly privileged and also almost entirely irrelevant. (See Docs. 2235, 2296, 3935, 8143, 8146, 8877). In sum, the Court finds that Plaintiffs either are not entitled to the submitted documents or don’t need them (or both). Therefore, the Court will not compel the production of any of the submitted documents. SO ORDERED Signed: December 21, 2022 2 Case 3:10-cv-00472-KDB Document 332 Filed 12/21/22 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?