Hinton v. Henderson et al
Filing
38
ORDER denying 37 Motion for Discovery Materials and Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/1/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)
-DLH Hinton v. Henderson et al
Doc. 38
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:10cv505 CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, Plaintiff, Vs. MICHAEL W. HENDERSON; PETER S. GILCHRIST; TERESA BROADWAY; and ANDREW RUDGERS, Probation Officer, Defendants. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Materials and Interrogatories (#37). Such motion is premature as the time for
discovery has not commenced and cannot commence until issue join and a Pretrial Order has been entered. Other than consensual discovery, the Local Civil Rules provide that "Court enforceable discovery does not commence until issues have joined and a Scheduling Order is entered." L.Cv.R. 16.1(F). ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Materials and Interrogatories (#37) is DENIED.
-1-
Dockets.Justia.com
Signed: March 1, 2011
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?