Raniszewski et al v. Davidson

Filing 21

ORDER re 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, ( Supplemental Brief due by 8/1/2011). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/21/11. (gpb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION NO. 3:11-CV-00059 CATHY RANISZEWSKI, as personal representative of the Estate of Joseph M. Marett, Jr. and SAV/WAY FOODS, INC., ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) v. ) ) WILLIAM B. DAVIDSON, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion. Plaintiff and Defendant have fulled briefed the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [D.I. 15]. In all of the briefs, the parties cite to North Carolina case law. However, the Stock Purchase Agreement, which appears to be at the center of the present dispute, contains an explicit choice of law clause which provides that “[t]he validity and construction of this Agreement shall be governed by the substantive laws of the State of South Carolina.” D.I. 10, Ex. 12, Stock Purchase Agreement, at 5. The parties are therefore directed to file a supplemental brief addressing whether South Carolina law should apply, and what effect, if any, South Carolina law has on this dispute. The responses should be filed by 5:00 p.m., Monday, August 1, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: July 21, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?