Rivers v. Time Warner Cable Inc.
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 17 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 4/5/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-00146-RJC-DSC
CHRISTINE RIVERS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
__________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel,” Doc. 17, filed
March 6, 2012, and the parties’ associated briefs and exhibits. See Doc. 17-1, 18 and 19.
This Motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§636(b)(1), and is now ripe for the Court’s consideration.
Plaintiff asks that the Court compel Defendant to respond to Interrogatory 2 and Requests
for Production 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 10. In response, Defendant credibly argues that it has complied
fully with Requests for Production 2, 3 and 5 and that Plaintiff’s remaining requests seek
information and documents that have no relevance to her claims in this lawsuit. The Court has
carefully examined the record, the parties’ arguments and the applicable authorities. For the reasons
cited in Defendant’s brief, Plaintiff’s Motion is denied.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. “Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel,” Doc. 17 is DENIED.
2. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se
Plaintiff, counsel for Defendant; and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 5, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?