Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. White et al
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Motion for Entry of Judgment. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 05/08/2012. (blf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:11-CV-168-FDW
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
LERONNE WHITE,
as Personal Representative ofthe
Estate of ELJUAN WHITE;
R. MICHAEL ALLEN,
as Personal Representative of
the Estate of SUGEYRIS CEPEDA
WHITE; and B. W., a Minor,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT JUDGMENT
THIS MATTER coming on before the Court upon the Joint Motion (Doc. No. 29) of
Defendants R. Michael Allen, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sugeyris Cepeda White,
through his undersigned counsel, and B.W., a Minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Mark
D. Gott and his counsel, for entry of this Consent Judgment settling all of the matters at issue
between the parties and to dismiss this action with prejudice for a consent award of reasonable
attorney’s fees and costs to the moving parties herein; and it appearing to the Court from the Motion,
and upon review of the pleadings to date, that the Plaintiff Unum paid in to the Registry of the Court
amounts due under a Policy of Insurance totaling $201,430.14 (“Fund”); that this payment satisfied
Unum’s obligations under the Policy at issue; that Unum was discharged with the consent of the
parties herewith (Doc. No. 26); that Defendant LeRonne White, as Personal Representative of the
Estate of ElJuan White, failed to answer and after default having been entered, judgment was
entered against him dismissing any and all claims he may have had or has to the Fund; that the
remaining Defendants (Ms. White) and the Minor, B.W., by and through their respective personal
representatives and Guardian ad Litem, respectively, consent herewith to the entry of this Judgment
resolving all of the issues each had or may have as to the Fund; and that the entry of this Judgment
with prejudice concludes the case.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
1.
The joint Motion of Defendants R. Michael Allen, as Personal Representative of the Estate
of Sugeyris Cepeda White through his undersigned counsel, and B.W., a Minor, through his
Guardian ad Litem, Mark D. Gott and respective counsel (Doc. No. 29), is GRANTED;
2.
From the Fund deposited with the Clerk herein, the Clerk shall, by check made payable to
the Estate of Sugeyris Cepeda White, pay the sum of $13,951.24, which check shall be mailed to
the Estate c/o R. Michael Allen, as Personal Representative;
3.
From said Fund, the Clerk shall, by check made payable to Sellers, Hinshaw, Ayers, Dortsch
& Lyons, P.A., pay the sum of $3,300.00 for the reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred by
Guardian ad Litem in representing the Minor, B.W., in this matter;
4.
The balance of the Fund in the Office of the Clerk of Court be paid, by check made payable
to the Clerk of Superior Court for Wilson County, North Carolina, c/o Mark D. Gott, Guardian ad
Litem of the Minor B.W.;
5.
The entry of this Judgment, by consent, concludes all of the issues in this case, and upon
payment by the Clerk’s Office of the funds provided herein, this matter is dismissed, with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: May 8, 2012
2
WE CONSENT:
s/Michael F. Schultze
Michael F. Schultze, Bar Number: 12547
Attorney for Defendant R. Michael Allen,
as Personal Representative of the Estate of
Sugeyris Cepeda White
Cranford, Buckley, Schultze, Tomchin,
Allen & Buie, P.A.
7257 Pineville-Matthews Road, Suite 2100
Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone: (704) 442-1010
Fax: (704) 442-1020
E-mail: mschultze@southcharlottelawfirm.com
s/Brett E. Dressler
Brett E. Dressler, Bar Number: 34516
Attorney for the Guardian ad Litem
Sellers, Hinshaw, Ayers, Dortch & Lyons, P.A.
301 South McDowell Street
Charlotte, NC 28204
Telephone: (704) 377-505
Fax: (704) 339-0172
E-mail: bdressler@sellershinshaw.com
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?