Dunlap v. United Parcel Services

Filing 13

ORDER re 10 MOTION to Dismiss. (Plaintiff's Response due by 9/29/2011.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/20/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail, certified 7003 1010 0003 5291 2860.)(gpb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-179-RJC-DCK JALONDA NICHEL DUNLAP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL SERVICES, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of “Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss” (Document No. 10). In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she has a right to respond to Defendant’s motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendant being granted the relief it seeks, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to the pending “Motion To Dismiss” (Document No. 10) on or before September 29, 2011. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff by certified U.S. Mail. Signed: September 20, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?