Wright v. Keller

Filing 19

ORDER denying as moot 17 Motion to Review Contents of Documents Send by Petitioner to be Reflected on Case Dockets. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 12/5/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail with a copy of this Order and the docket sheet.)(gpb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:11CV341-RJC LOY ALEXANDER WRIGHT, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ALVIN KELLER, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner’s “Motion to Review Contents of Documents Send (sic) by Petitioner to be Reflected on Case Dockets” filed November 30, 2011. Petitioner seems to be under the impression that the Court has not received all of the documents he has sent to the Court because the docket entries are not sufficiently detailed. By way of example, Petitioner notes that the declaration he sent to the Court included two affidavits which were stapled to his declaration. The docket sheet simply lists the declaration as docket entry number 8; therefore Petitioner is under the impression that the affidavits are not part of the Court’s record. However, the Court can assure Petitioner that the affidavits were attached to his declaration and the Court has reviewed all of those documents. Likewise, the Court has also received Petitioner’s Motion to Amend to name the proper respondent and his “Motion for Consideration” filed on November 2, 2011. Both motions were addressed in the Court’s Order dated November 15, 2011 (Doc. No. 15). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion (Doc. No. 17) is denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a copy of this Order as well as an 1 updated copy of his docket sheet. Signed: December 5, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?