Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. et al

Filing 29

ORDER granting 26 Motion for Reconsideration, and having carefully reconsidered the M&R of Judge Keesler in light of the plaintiffs motion, the court reaffirms its earlier Order adopting the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 1/5/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:11cv391
RAYMOND A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
Vs.
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.; C.
MATTHEW KEEN; SHERA K.
STEWART; and BRIAN M. FREEDMAN,
Defendants.
_______________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration.
Having considered plaintiff’s motion and reviewed the pleadings, and it appearing that
plaintiff has provided the court with no plausible legal or factual basis for reconsideration of
its affirmance of the Memorandum and Recommendation of Judge Keesler, the court enters
the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (#26)
is GRANTED, and having carefully reconsidered the M&R of Judge Keesler in light of the
plaintiff’s motion, the court reaffirms its earlier Order adopting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge.
Signed: January 5, 2012