Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. et al

Filing 8

ORDER re 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).(Plaintiff's Response to Motion 6 due by 9/26/2011.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/12/11. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(gpb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-0391-MOC-DCK
RAYMOND A. JOHNSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
)
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.,
)
C. MATTHEW KEEN,
)
BRIAN M. FREEDMAN, and
)
SHERA K. STEWART,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of
“Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint” (Document No. 6).
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendants’ motion. The Court
also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendants being granted the relief they
seek, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff may respond to the pending “Defendants’
Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint” (Document No. 6) on or before September 26, 2011.
Failure to file a timely and persuasive response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit.
Signed: September 12, 2011