Byrd v. Astrue
Filing
17
ORDER re 15 MOTION to Alter Judgment (EAJA) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/18/2012. (eef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-501-MOC-DCK
DARRYL BYRD,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Defendant’s Motion To Alter Or Amend
Judgment Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 59(e)” (Document No. 15) filed May 11,
2012. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b), and immediate review is appropriate.
The undersigned observes that the pending motion does not show that the “Requirement Of
Consultation” has been met pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant shall file a Notice with the Court, on or
before May 25, 2012, informing the Court of Plaintiff’s position on the pending “Defendant’s
Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 59(e)”
(Document No. 15), consistent with Local Rule 7.1(B).
SO ORDERED.
Signed: May 18, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?