Dong v. BASF Corporation et al
Filing
16
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/3/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:11-CV-605-MOC-DCK
YAN DONG,
Plaintiff,
v.
BASF CORPORATION AND
JONATHAN ANTONUCCI,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED by the Court that the following restrictions and procedures shall
apply to certain information, documents and excerpts from documents supplied by the parties to
each other in response to discovery requests:
1.
Counsel for any party may designate any document or information contained in a
document as confidential if counsel determines, in good faith, that such designation is necessary
to protect the interests of the client. Information and documents designated by a party as
confidential will be labeled “CONFIDENTIAL – PRODUCED PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE
ORDER.” “Confidential” information or documents may be referred to collectively as
“confidential information.”
2.
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, or otherwise provided for herein, the
confidential information disclosed will be held and used by the person receiving such
information solely for use in connection with the above-captioned action.
3.
In the event a party challenges another party’s confidential designation, the
parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute, and in the absence of a resolution,
the challenging party may thereafter seek resolution by the Court. Nothing in this Protective
Order constitutes an admission by any party that confidential information disclosed in this case
is relevant or admissible. Each party specifically reserves the right to object to the use or
admissibility of all confidential information disclosed, in accordance with applicable law.
4.
Information or documents designated as “Confidential” shall not be disclosed to
any person, except:
a.
b.
Employees of such counsel assigned to and necessary to assist in the
litigation;
c.
Consultants or experts to the extent deemed necessary by counsel;
d.
Any person from whom testimony is taken or is to be taken, except that
such a person may only be shown confidential information during and in
preparation for his/her testimony and may not retain the confidential
information; and
e.
5.
The requesting party and counsel;
The Court or the jury at trial or as exhibits to motions.
Prior to disclosing or displaying the confidential information to any person,
counsel shall:
a.
b.
6.
Inform the person of the confidential nature of the information or
documents; and
Inform the person that this Court has enjoined the use of the information
or documents by him/her for any purpose other than this litigation and has
enjoined the disclosure of that information or documents to any other
person.
The confidential information may be displayed to and discussed with the persons
identified in Paragraph 4(c) and (d) only on the condition that prior to any such display or
discussion, each such person shall be asked to sign an agreement to be bound by this Order in the
form attached as Exhibit A. In the event such person refuses to sign an agreement in the form
attached as Exhibit A, the party desiring to disclose the confidential information may seek
appropriate relief from this Court.
7.
For the purpose of Paragraphs 4(d) and (e) it is understood by the parties that any
documents which become part of an official judicial proceeding or which are filed with the Court
are public documents, and that such documents can and will be sealed by the Court only upon
motion and in accordance with applicable law. This Protective Order does not provide for the
automatic sealing of such documents.
8.
At the conclusion of litigation, the confidential information and any copies
thereof shall be promptly (and in no event later than thirty (30) days after entry of a final
judgment no longer subject to further appeal) returned to the producing party or certified as
destroyed.
9.
The foregoing is entirely without prejudice to the right of any party to apply to the
Court for any further Protective Order relating to confidential information; or to object to the
production of documents or information; or to apply to the Court for an order compelling
production of documents or information; or for modification of this Order.
10.
The ultimate disposition of protected materials are subject to a final order of the
Court on the completion of this litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 3, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:11-CV-605-MOC-DCK
YAN DONG,
Plaintiff,
v.
BASF CORPORATION AND
JONATHAN ANTONUCCI,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
EXHIBIT A TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
I have been informed by counsel that certain documents or information to be disclosed to
me in connection with the matter entitled Yan Dong v. BASF Corporation and Jonathan
Antonucci, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-605, have been designated as confidential. I have been
informed that any such document or information labeled as “CONFIDENTIAL – PRODUCED
PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” are confidential by Order of the Court.
Under penalty of contempt of Court, I hereby agree that I will not disclose any
information contained in such documents to any other person, and I further agree not to use any
such information for any purpose other than this litigation.
DATED:
Signed in the presence of:
(Attorney)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?