Shareef v. Donahoe et al

Filing 39

ORDER denying without prejudice 32 Motion to Compel; granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time of Scheduling Order Deadlines. ( Discovery due by 3/6/2013., Motions due by 4/5/2013., Mediation deadline set for 3/20/2013 ., Jury Trial set for 8/19/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Magistrate Judge David Keesler.); Status and Motions Hearing re:(Document No. 20) set for 11/15/2012 at 2:00 pm.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/25/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-615-DCK
KIMBERLY F. SHAREEF,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PATRICK R. DONAHUE,
)
DAVID MILLS, and
)
RODNEY K. DEFLUMERI,
)
)
Defendants,
)
____________________________________)

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Federal Defendant’s Motion To Extend
Discovery” (Document No. 35) filed September 27, 2012. The parties have consented to Magistrate
Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and this motion is ripe for disposition. Having
carefully considered the motion, the record, and the applicable authority, the undersigned will grant
the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Federal Defendant’s Motion To Extend
Discovery” (Document No. 35) is GRANTED. As such, the deadlines in this case are revised as
follows:
Discovery

March 6, 2013;

Mediation Report

March 20, 2013;

Dispositive Motions

April 5, 2013;

Trial

August 19, 2013.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Plaintiff’s Request For Motion To Compel / Defendants
Failure To Produce Documents” (Document No. 32) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The
Court directs the parties to confer in an attempt to resolve this dispute; if such attempt is
unsuccessful, Plaintiff may re-file her motion to compel.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a Status And Motions
Hearing on Thursday November 15, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., prepared to discuss the status of this case
and the pending “Motion For Pretrial Hearing On Federal Defendant’s 12(b)(1) Defense Of Lack
Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction” (Document No. 20).
SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 25, 2012

2