Shareef v. Donahoe et al

Filing 86

ORDER granting 85 Motion to Stay Pending Resolution Of Appeal To Fourth Circuit Court Of Appeals; Further Ordered that plaintiff file a response to 62 Motion to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, For Summary Judgment within 14 days of the Fourth Circuits resolution of both appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/29/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-615-DCK KIMBERLY F. SHAREEF, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Plaintiff’s Motion To Stay Further Proceedings Pending Resolution Of Appeal To Fourth Circuit Court Of Appeals” (Document No. 82). The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review of this motion is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will grant the motion. The undersigned notes that Plaintiff has now appealed two (2) of the Court’s orders, and that decisions on those appeals by the Fourth Circuit are still pending. See (Document Nos. 67 and 83). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Plaintiff’s Motion To Stay Further Proceedings Pending Resolution Of Appeal To Fourth Circuit Court Of Appeals” (Document No. 82) is GRANTED. This matter is STAYED, pending resolution by the Fourth Circuit Court Of Appeals of Plaintiff’s appeals of the undersigned’s “Order” (Document No. 55) and “Order” (Document No. 81). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to “Federal Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, For Summary Judgment” (Document No. 62) within fourteen (14) days of the Fourth Circuit’s resolution of both appeals. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response may lead to Defendant being granted the relief sought, including dismissal of this lawsuit. SO ORDERED. Signed: August 29, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?