Bonapart v. Baca-Stepan et al

Filing 6

ORDER, Set Deadline as to 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim .(Responses due by 4/9/2012). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/22/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bsw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-37-MOC-DCK THADIUS LEONARD BONAPART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NANCY BACA-STEPAN, ) FELICIA HEARD, and ) ANN STENHOLM, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of “Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss” (Document No. 4). In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendants’ motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendants being granted the relief they seek, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff may respond to the pending “Motion To Dismiss” (Document No. 4) on or before April 9, 2012. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit. Signed: March 22, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?