Mead v. Gaston County Police Department et al

Filing 105

ORDER terminating as moot 96 Motion to Quash; terminating as moot 97 Motion to Quash; granting 104 Motion to Withdraw previously filed motions to quash without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 08/12/2014. (jlk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:12-CV-132
MICHAEL MEAD,
Plaintiff,
v.
REGINALD BLOOM, individually and
officially, WILLIAM H. SAMPSON,
individually and officially, and CALIVIN
SHAW, individually and officially,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Movant William Setzer’s Motion to Withdraw
(Doc. No. 104). Movant seeks to withdraw his previously filed motions to quash (Doc. Nos. 96
& 97) without prejudice. In support, he shows that the subpoena with which the motions are
concerned has been withdrawn. For good cause shown, his Motion is GRANTED. Movant’s
motions to quash (Doc. Nos. 96 & 97) are TERMINATED as moot. Movant is free to re-file
these motions later should the need arise.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: August 12, 2014