Kargarian v. Auto Zone

Filing 17

ORDER re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief can be Granted (Responses due by 5/18/2012.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 05/01/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:12CV144-MOC-DSC MOHAMMAD M. KARGARIAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) AUTOZONE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) __________________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding Defendant’s “Partial Motion To Dismiss” (document #16) filed April 30, 2012. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendant’s Motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendant being granted the relief it seeks, that is, the DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is allowed until May 18, 2012 to respond to Defendant’s “Partial Motion To Dismiss.” SO ORDERED. Signed: May 1, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?