Kargarian v. Auto Zone

Filing 17

ORDER re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief can be Granted (Responses due by 5/18/2012.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 05/01/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(blf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:12CV144-MOC-DSC
MOHAMMAD M. KARGARIAN,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
AUTOZONE,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
__________________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding Defendant’s “Partial
Motion To Dismiss” (document #16) filed April 30, 2012.
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendant’s Motion. The Court
also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendant being granted the relief it
seeks, that is, the DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is allowed until May 18, 2012 to respond
to Defendant’s “Partial Motion To Dismiss.”
SO ORDERED.

Signed: May 1, 2012