Chester v. US Security Associates

Filing 36

ORDER re: 35 Motion to Strike. The Court treats Plaintiff's Motion as a response to Defendant's 33 Motion to Quash. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/13/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) Modified on 3/13/2013, referred to David S. Cayer (tmg).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:12-CV-00204-FDW-DSC
LAKESHA SHANTAY CHESTER,

)

)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
US SECURITY ASSOCIATES,
)
)
Defendant. )
_________________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before this Court upon Plaintiff Lakesha Chester’s Motion to Strike
(“Plaintiff’s Motion”). (Doc. No. 35).

Plaintiff’s Motion is filed with respect to Defendant US

Security Associates’ Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s Subpoenas (“Defendant’s Motion”). (Doc. No.
33).

Plaintiff’s Motion requests that this Court strike Defendant’s Motion because of conditions

Plaintiff has agreed to that Plaintiff claims render arguments made in Defendant’s Motion moot.
As such, the Court treats Plaintiff’s Motion as a response to Defendant’s Motion. Because
Defendant’s Motion was referred to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer, and because Plaintiff’s
Motion is being treated as a response to Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff’s Motion is hereby also
REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Cayer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: March 13, 2013