Chester v. US Security Associates

Filing 36

ORDER re: 35 Motion to Strike. The Court treats Plaintiff's Motion as a response to Defendant's 33 Motion to Quash. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/13/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) Modified on 3/13/2013, referred to David S. Cayer (tmg).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:12-CV-00204-FDW-DSC LAKESHA SHANTAY CHESTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) US SECURITY ASSOCIATES, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before this Court upon Plaintiff Lakesha Chester’s Motion to Strike (“Plaintiff’s Motion”). (Doc. No. 35). Plaintiff’s Motion is filed with respect to Defendant US Security Associates’ Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s Subpoenas (“Defendant’s Motion”). (Doc. No. 33). Plaintiff’s Motion requests that this Court strike Defendant’s Motion because of conditions Plaintiff has agreed to that Plaintiff claims render arguments made in Defendant’s Motion moot. As such, the Court treats Plaintiff’s Motion as a response to Defendant’s Motion. Because Defendant’s Motion was referred to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer, and because Plaintiff’s Motion is being treated as a response to Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff’s Motion is hereby also REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Cayer. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: March 13, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?