Chester v. US Security Associates
ORDER re: 35 Motion to Strike. The Court treats Plaintiff's Motion as a response to Defendant's 33 Motion to Quash. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/13/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg) Modified on 3/13/2013, referred to David S. Cayer (tmg).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
DOCKET NO. 3:12-CV-00204-FDW-DSC
LAKESHA SHANTAY CHESTER,
US SECURITY ASSOCIATES,
THIS MATTER is before this Court upon Plaintiff Lakesha Chester’s Motion to Strike
(“Plaintiff’s Motion”). (Doc. No. 35).
Plaintiff’s Motion is filed with respect to Defendant US
Security Associates’ Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s Subpoenas (“Defendant’s Motion”). (Doc. No.
Plaintiff’s Motion requests that this Court strike Defendant’s Motion because of conditions
Plaintiff has agreed to that Plaintiff claims render arguments made in Defendant’s Motion moot.
As such, the Court treats Plaintiff’s Motion as a response to Defendant’s Motion. Because
Defendant’s Motion was referred to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer, and because Plaintiff’s
Motion is being treated as a response to Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff’s Motion is hereby also
REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Cayer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 13, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?