Thompson v. Astrue

Filing 24

ORDER denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; affirming 22 Memorandum and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/10/2013. (eef)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:12CV399
SPARKLE THOMPSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
Vs.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United
States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed July 26, 2013.

The parties were advised that pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the memorandum and recommendation must
be filed within 14 days after service of the memorandum.

Plaintiff timely filed an objection.

After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum and
Plaintiff’s objections thereto, the Court concludes that the recommendation to deny the
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and grant the Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment is correct and in accordance with law. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of
the magistrate are accepted, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and the
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the memorandum and recommendation of the
magistrate is hereby AFFIRMED.

Signed: September 10, 2013