Latimer et al v. US Social Security Administration et al
Filing
11
ORDER denying 10 Motion for Disposition of Children. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 05/12/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:12-cv-00406-MOC-DSC
CALVIN LATIMER and
SANDRA LATIMER,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
Vs.
)
)
US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et. )
al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the court on Plaintiffs’ pro se “Motion for Disposition of
Children.” (#10). Review of the record indicates that this court does not have jurisdiction over
this case and that this matter was remanded to state court in August 2012. (##7, 8). This case is
thus closed in this court. Review of the documents that Plaintiffs filed with their letter to the
court (#9; 9-1) also indicates that upon remand, this case was dismissed from the Superior Court
of Mecklenburg County in November 2012 and Plaintiff s were served with a copy of the Order
dismissing the case. (#9-1, p. 29-33).
Having no jurisdiction over this matter, and thus being unable to grant any relief to
Plaintiffs, the court will direct the clerk of court to send copies of Plaintiffs’ “Motion” to the
Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, which adjudicated the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims. The
court therefore enters the following Order.
-1-
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ pro se “Motion for Disposition of
Children” (#10), to the extent it seeks relief from this court, is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court send copies of Plaintiffs’ Motion
(#10) and this Order to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County.
Signed: May 12, 2015
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?