Harlan v. Astrue

Filing 34

ORDER granting 31 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court awards Plaintiff's counsel fees in the amount of $20,099.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon receipt of the requested fee, counsel shall promptly refund Plaintiff Dustin Harlan $6,259.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/1/16. (mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-443-GCM-DCK DUSTIN M. HARLAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorney’s Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)” (Document No. 31). This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and is now ripe for disposition. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion. By the instant motion, Plaintiff’s counsel seeks an award of attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), which provides that a “court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee . . . not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past due benefits to which claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment.” It appears that the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) has determined that Plaintiff’s past due benefits are $82,750.00 for the period after December 31, 2009. (Document No. 31-1, p.8). The SSA has withheld $20,687.50 from Plaintiff’s past-due benefits to pay his representative(s). (Document No. 31-1, p.8). The undersigned notes that Plaintiff’s “Petition For Attorney Fees And Costs” (Document No. 26) sought, and was allowed, attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,259.00. Plaintiff’s counsel now asserts that the $6,259.00 in EAJA attorney fees will be reimbursed to Plaintiff upon award and receipt of the § 406(b) fees. (Document No. 31-1, p.10). Recent caselaw provides that a court should review contingent-fee agreements, such as the one here, for reasonableness. Griffin v. Astrue, 1:10cv115-MR, 2012 WL 3155578 at *2 (W.D.N.C. August 2, 2012) (citing Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002) and Mudd v. Barnhart, 418 F.3d 424 (4th Cir. 2005)). Plaintiff’s counsel now seeks an award of $20,099.00 in attorney’s fees. (Document No. 31, p.1). In response, Defendant states that “[t]he Commissioner has no objection to a reasonable award of fees to Counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b), so long as it does not exceed $20,099.00.” (Document No. 33, p.3). Based on the foregoing, and the parties’ briefs, the undersigned is satisfied that Plaintiff’s request for fees is reasonable and consistent with applicable authority. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorney’s Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)” (Document No. 31) is GRANTED. The Court awards Plaintiff’s counsel fees in the amount of $20,099.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon receipt of the requested fee, counsel shall promptly refund Plaintiff Dustin Harlan in the amount of $6,259.00 SO ORDERED. Signed: March 1, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?