Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rex Venture Group, LLC et al

Filing 375

ORDER Scheduling Further Proceedings as stated on #291 Motion for an Order Directing NxSystems, Inc. to Turn Over Receivership Assets and/or Find It in Contempt of the Court's Agreed Order. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/9/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:12 cv 519 vs. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC d/b/a ZEEKREWARDS.COM, and PAUL BURKS, Defendants. ORDER The Court held a status hearing on June 24, 2015 on the Receiver’s Motion for an Order Directing NxSystems, Inc. to Turn Over Receivership Assets and/or Find it in Contempt of the Court’s Agreed Order. (Doc. No. 291). In the interests of justice and with the consent of the parties, the Court enters the following schedule for further proceedings on the pending motion: 1. The parties shall identify to each other their expected witnesses (both lay and expert) 30 days from the date of the status hearing. 2. The parties shall complete Discovery 105 days from the date of the status hearing. 3. The parties shall be permitted to take up to 3 depositions for each side, with the understanding that additional depositions can be requested if necessary based on discovery or witness identification. 4. The parties shall make a pre-hearing Disclosure of the Witnesses and Documents they expect to be used at Hearing 15 days following the close of Discovery. 5. The Court will hold a hearing on the Motion (2 days expected length) in or after November 2015 on a date to be determined. 6. The parties are required to file with the Court Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 5 days prior to the hearing date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: July 9, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?