Frye v. Astrue

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/11/2013. (eef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-649-FDW-DCK LEONARD FRYE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant’s “Consent Motion For Order Accepting The Parties’ Settlement Agreement On Attorney Fees And Costs” (Document No. 17) filed July 10, 2013. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and record, and applicable authority, and noting consent of Plaintiff’s counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Consent Motion For Order Accepting The Parties’ Settlement Agreement On Attorney Fees And Costs” (Document No. 17) is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Social Security Administration shall pay attorney’s fees in the amount of six thousand five hundred dollars ($6,500.00) in full satisfaction of any and all attorney’s fee claims Plaintiff may have in this case under EAJA. Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), these attorney’s fees are payable to Plaintiff as the prevailing party, and are subject to offset through the Treasury Department’s Offset Program to satisfy any pre-existing debt Plaintiff may owe to the government. SO ORDERED. Signed: July 11, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?