Warrington v. King et al

Filing 6

Order vacating re: 4 Order. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/29/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:12-CV-00671-FDW-DCK
CHANTEL E. WARRINGTON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CHRIS KING, JOHN DOE & JANE DOE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff Chantel E. Warrington’s Notice of
Petition and Verified Petition For Warrant of Removal.1 (Doc. No. 3). The Court previously issued
an Order denying Plaintiff’s Petition. (Doc. No. 4). That Order is hereby VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 29, 2012

1

In her Petition, Ms. W arrington lists herself as Petitioner and the “State of North Carolina[,] Mecklenberg
County” as Respondent (although, in her certificate of service for the Petition, she later lists Chris King as the only party
of record in the lower state court proceedings). (Doc. No. 3). Since the first document filed in this case is Ms.
W arrington’s Complaint listing herself as Plaintiff and Chris King, John Doe, and Jane Doe as Defendants, (Doc. No.
1), this Order will refer to Ms. W arrington as Plaintiff, not Petitioner.