Securities and Exchange Commission v. Femenia et al
ORDER CONTINUING AND PARTIALLY LIFTING ASSET FREEZE WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT FRANK M. BURGESS re 100 MOTION for Release of Funds . Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/22/2013. (eef)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Civil Action No.
JOHN W. FEMENIA, SHAWN C. HEGEDUS,
DANIELLE C. LAURENTI, CORAM REAL
ESTATE HOLDING, INC., GOLDSTAR P.S. INC.,
ROGER A. WILLIAMS, , KENNETH M. RABY,
FRANK M. BURGESS, JAMES A. HAYES,
MATTHEW J. MUSANTE, ANTHONY C.
MUSANTE and AARON M. WENS,
KRISTINE LACK and CHRISTINE E. MUSANTE,
ORDER CONTINUING AND PARTIALLY LIFTING ASSET FREEZE
WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT FRANK M. BURGESS
WHEREAS on December 5, 2012, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC” or “Commission”) filed its Complaint [Dkt. No. 3] and Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and other relief against, among others, Defendant Frank M. Burgess
(“Burgess”) [Dkt. No. 4];
WHEREAS, the Court entered on December 5, 2012 a Temporary Restraining Order
Freezing Assets of Defendants and Relief Defendants and Granting Other Relief and for an
Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Be Issued (“December 5
Order”), including but not limited to, a freeze of the assets of Defendant Burgess [Dkt. No. 5];
WHEREAS, Defendant Burgess consented to the entry of a preliminary injunction order
against him, which the Court entered on December 13, 2012 [Dkt. No. 26];
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order of December 19, 2013 continued and partially lifted the
asset freeze with respect to certain of Burgess’ assets [Dkt. No. 41];
WHEREAS, the Court, by further orders, continued and partially lifted the asset freeze
with respect to certain of Burgess’ assets from time to time;
WHEREAS, Defendant Burgess seeks further partial relief from the asset freeze in order
to operate his business, Burgess Group of Charlotte, LLC (“Burgess Group”), and to pay Burgess
a reasonable salary;
WHEREAS, the Court has been advised that the Commission does not object to the relief
WHEREAS, the Court has been advised that, upon the ordering of the relief contained
herein, Burgess wishes to withdraw and deem as moot his Motion for Partial Relief from Asset
Freeze by Modification of Preliminary Injunction filed on May 7, 2013 [Dkt. No. 100];
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the asset freeze with respect to the assets of Frank M.
Burgess is hereby continued until further order of the Court, EXCEPT THAT the asset freeze
with respect to the following Burgess SunTrust Bank accounts shall be lifted in and up to the
following amounts to permit Burgess and Burgess’ Group to continue normal operations and
pay ordinary and customary expenses, including but not limited to, using such money to satisfy
Burgess Group’s bonding requirements and to pay Burgess a monthly salary in the amount of
$10,000 per month beginning June 1, 2013;
Account number xxxx-xxxx-1023 in and up to the amount of $50,000.00;
Account number xxxx-xxxx-95719 in and up to the amount of $68,000; and
Account number xxxx-xxxx-92277 in and up to the amount of $41,000.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Burgess’ Motion for Partial
Relief from Asset Freeze by Modification of Preliminary Injunction filed on May 7, 2013 is
hereby deemed withdrawn and moot [Dkt. No. 100].
All other terms and provisions of the Court’s prior orders with respect to Burgess shall
remain in full force and effect pending further order of the Court.
Signed: May 22, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?