Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
35
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Stay motion to dismiss.. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 5/23/2013. (blf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:13cv116
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL NO. 636 DEFINED
BENEFIT PENSION FUND, Individually and
on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
Vs.
)
)
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
)
HOWARD R. LEVINE, MARY A. WINSTON )
and MICHAEL K. BLOOM
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the court on Plaintiff’s Expedited Motion to Stay Response to
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
Plaintiffs request that the motion be stayed pending the
appointment of a lead plaintiff and the filing of an amended complaint. Since the motion was
filed, the court entered an Order (#32) appointing Plaintiff as Lead Plaintiff. As Defendants have
filed a response and Plaintiff a reply, the motion is ripe for disposition.
Plaintiffs propose a briefing schedule which would provide the Amended Complaint to be
filed within 45 days of the court’s May 14, or, by July 1, and Defendant’s response to be filed 45
days thereafter. Defendants’ opposition essentially focuses on the extended briefing schedule
proposed by Plaintiffs, and instead, citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(B), contend that the Amended
Complaint should be filed by May 28, 2013.
While not unmindful of Defendants’ desires to have this matter progress as quickly as
possible, the court cannot see how granting Plaintiff’s motion would cause Defendant any undue
prejudice. Given the lenient standard provided in Rule 15(a)(2) for amendments after expiration
of the 21 day period and the somewhat cumbersome nature of class action suits in their early
stages with the lead plaintiff procedures, the court finds good cause to allow the motion as
follows.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Expedited Motion to Stay Response
to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (#27) is GRANTED and the Motion to Dismiss (#16) is
STAYED. The court will also grant the motion to the extent that it includes an inherent Motion
to Amend the Complaint, as the time for an amendment as-of-right will expire on May 27.
Finally, the court enters the following briefing schedule for this matter to proceed:
1.
Within 30 days of the entry of this Order, Plaintiff’s shall file its Amended
Complaint.
2.
Defendants shall file its Motion to Dismiss, if any, within 21 days of the filing of
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.
3.
Plaintiff shall file its Opposition within 21 days thereafter.
4.
Defendant shall file its Reply within 14 days thereafter.
Signed: May 23, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?