Pendergrass v. NC Department of Public Safety et al

Filing 50

ORDER granting 49 Motion for Judicial Order. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/24/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:13-cv-129-RJC GUY T. PENDERGRASS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT ) OF PUBLIC SAFETY, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Order, (Doc. No. 49). Plaintiff seeks an order from this Court instructing the U.S. Marshal to use reasonable efforts to locate and obtain service on Defendants Cross, Medlin, Rizaldi, and Walrath.1 The Court will grant the motion. See Greene v. Holloway, 210 F.3d 361 (4th Cir. 2000) (where the district court dismissed a defendant in a Section 1983 action based on the prisoner’s failure to provide an address for service on a defendant who no longer worked at the sheriff’s office, remanding so the district court could “evaluate whether the marshals could have served [Defendant] with reasonable effort”). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Pro Se Motion for Judicial Order, (Doc. No. 49), is GRANTED. The U.S. Marshal shall use all reasonable efforts to locate and obtain service on Defendants Cross, Medlin, Rizaldi, and Walrath. If the U.S. Marshal is unable to 1 On September 26, 2014, the U.S. Marshal returned unexecuted summonses as to these Defendants. 1 locate and obtain service on these Defendants, the U.S. Marshal shall inform the Court of the efforts made in attempting to locate Defendants Cross, Medlin, Rizaldi, and Walrath. Signed: November 24, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?