Watterson et al v. Burgess et al
Filing
154
ORDER granting 150 Motion to Compel Discovery. Defendant Green shall provide complete discovery responses to Plaintiff on or before September 12, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/7/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-159-FDW-DCK
JEFFREY RANDOLPH WATTERSON, and
RANDOLPH ALEXANDER WATTERSON,
Plaintiffs,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
WOODY BURGESS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Plaintiff Randolph A Watterson’s
Motion To Compel Discovery” (Document No. 150) filed on August 15, 2016. The pending
motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and
immediate review is appropriate.
Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and
applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion.
Notably, Defendant Jason Green has not filed a response to the motion, and the time to do
so has lapsed. See Local Rule 7.1(E). Plaintiff’s motion indicates that Defendant Green’s counsel
represented that discovery responses would be provided no later than August 19, 2016. (Document
No. 150 p.2). However, with no response or other notice on the record, there is no evidence before
the Court that the promised discovery has been provided.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Plaintiff Randolph A Watterson’s Motion To
Compel Discovery” (Document No. 150) is GRANTED. Defendant Green shall provide complete
discovery responses to Plaintiff on or before September 12, 2016.
The Clerk of Court is further directed to send a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiffs, and
the pro se Defendant, at the addresses listed on the docket for the case by certified U.S. Mail,
return receipt requested.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 7, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?