Watterson et al v. Burgess et al

Filing 154

ORDER granting 150 Motion to Compel Discovery. Defendant Green shall provide complete discovery responses to Plaintiff on or before September 12, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/7/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-159-FDW-DCK JEFFREY RANDOLPH WATTERSON, and RANDOLPH ALEXANDER WATTERSON, Plaintiffs, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) WOODY BURGESS, et al., Defendants. ORDER ) ) ) ) ) THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Plaintiff Randolph A Watterson’s Motion To Compel Discovery” (Document No. 150) filed on August 15, 2016. The pending motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion. Notably, Defendant Jason Green has not filed a response to the motion, and the time to do so has lapsed. See Local Rule 7.1(E). Plaintiff’s motion indicates that Defendant Green’s counsel represented that discovery responses would be provided no later than August 19, 2016. (Document No. 150 p.2). However, with no response or other notice on the record, there is no evidence before the Court that the promised discovery has been provided. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Plaintiff Randolph A Watterson’s Motion To Compel Discovery” (Document No. 150) is GRANTED. Defendant Green shall provide complete discovery responses to Plaintiff on or before September 12, 2016. The Clerk of Court is further directed to send a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiffs, and the pro se Defendant, at the addresses listed on the docket for the case by certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested. SO ORDERED. Signed: September 7, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?