Watterson et al v. Burgess et al
ORDER re 58 Letter. The Court will treat this letter as a motion for reconsideration of his acceptance into the Program. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs motion, the motion is GRANTED; deferring ruling on 59 Motion for Production of Documents From Government. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/13/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
DOCKET NO. 3:13-cv-00159-FDW-DCK
JEFFERY RANDOLPH WATTERSON
and RANDOLPH ALEXANDER
WOODY BURGESS, JASON GREEN,
HOYLE, DAVID HODKINS, BOB
AUSTELL, MIKE ALLRED, DAVID
THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Jeffery R. Watterson’s
(“Plaintiff’s”) letter to the Court concerning his acceptance into the Pro Se Assistance Program
(the “Program”). (Doc. No. 58). Given Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will treat this letter as
a motion for reconsideration of his acceptance into the Program. Accordingly, for the reasons set
forth in Plaintiff’s motion, the motion is GRANTED.
Additionally, as to Plaintiff Randolph Watterson, who is incarcerated in a facility outside
of the Western District of North Carolina, the Clerk has been unable to find an attorney willing
to represent him as part of the Program.
The Court also notes that Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Production of Documents From
Government. (Doc. No. 59). Because this case is stayed pending Plaintiff’s participation in the
Program, the Court will defer its decision on this Motion until Plaintiff’s completion of the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 13, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?