Watterson et al v. Burgess et al

Filing 60

ORDER re 58 Letter. The Court will treat this letter as a motion for reconsideration of his acceptance into the Program. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs motion, the motion is GRANTED; deferring ruling on 59 Motion for Production of Documents From Government. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/13/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:13-cv-00159-FDW-DCK
JEFFERY RANDOLPH WATTERSON
and RANDOLPH ALEXANDER
WATTERSON,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WOODY BURGESS, JASON GREEN,
FRANKIE
DELLINGER,
JENNIFER
HOYLE, DAVID HODKINS, BOB
AUSTELL, MIKE ALLRED, DAVID
HODKINS,
and
the
CITY
OF
CHERRYVILLE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Jeffery R. Watterson’s
(“Plaintiff’s”) letter to the Court concerning his acceptance into the Pro Se Assistance Program
(the “Program”). (Doc. No. 58). Given Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will treat this letter as
a motion for reconsideration of his acceptance into the Program. Accordingly, for the reasons set
forth in Plaintiff’s motion, the motion is GRANTED.
Additionally, as to Plaintiff Randolph Watterson, who is incarcerated in a facility outside
of the Western District of North Carolina, the Clerk has been unable to find an attorney willing
to represent him as part of the Program.
The Court also notes that Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Production of Documents From
Government. (Doc. No. 59). Because this case is stayed pending Plaintiff’s participation in the
Program, the Court will defer its decision on this Motion until Plaintiff’s completion of the
Program.
1

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 13, 2015

2