Watterson et al v. Burgess et al

Filing 71

ORDER denying 70 Motion participation in mediation. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/24/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:13-cv-00159-FDW-DCK JEFFREY RANDOLPH WATTERSON and ) RANDOLPH ALEXANDER WATTERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WOODY BURGESS, JASON GREEN, ) FRANKIE DELLINGER, JENNIFER HOYLE, ) DAVID HODKINS, BOB AUSTELL, MIKE ) ALLRED, DAVID HODKINS, and the CITY ) OF CHERRYVILLE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Randolph A. Watterson’s letter to the undersigned of Court (Doc. No. 70). In his letter, which this Court liberally construes to be more appropriately considered as a “motion,” Plaintiff Randolph A. Watterson requests this Court to permit him to participate in the mediation scheduled in accordance with the Pro Se Settlement Assistance Program (“PSAP”). This Court has previously denied this Plaintiff’s request to participate in this voluntary program because he is resides outside this district and because the Clerk was unable to find an attorney to represent him. (Docs. Nos. 56, 60). The arguments in Randolph A. Watterson’s instant “motion” do not change this fact. Accordingly, this motion is DENIED. This ruling should not deter the parties, including both Plaintiffs, from communicating with each other and engaging in settlement discussions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: July 24, 2015 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?