Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Mason et al
Filing
101
ORDER granting 89 Motion for Authority to Sue Net Winners. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/9/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
NO. 3:13-CV-196
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES HARVEY MASON,
Defendant, and
THE JHM FOREX ONLY POOL (f/k/a
THE JHM FOREX ONLY POOL, LP), and
FOREX TRADING AT HOME,
Relief Defendants.
ORDER REAPPOINTING RECEIVER AND AUTHORIZING RECEIVER TO
INITIATE ACTIONS AGAINST NET WINNERS
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Motion for Authority to Initiate Actions
Against Net Winners (Doc. No. 89) filed on August 21, 2014 by Joseph W. Grier, III, Receiver
(the “Receiver”), through counsel (the “Motion”). The Court finds that it has jurisdiction over
this matter and that notice was proper. No objections or other responses to the Motion have been
filed. The Court, having reviewed the Motion and the record in this case, finds and concludes as
follows:
1.
On March 27, 2013, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a
civil complaint against James Harvey Mason as Defendant and The JHM Forex Only Pool (f/k/a
The JHM Forex Only Pool, LP) and Forex Trading At Home as Relief Defendants (collectively,
the “Defendants”) (Doc. No. 1) (the “Complaint”), initiating this civil enforcement action.
2.
Also on March 27, 2013, the Court entered a Statutory Restraining Order (Doc.
No. 11) in this action appointing the Receiver and directing the Receiver to take custody, control
and possession of all funds, property and other assets in the possession or control of the
Defendants and to perform all acts necessary to hold, manage and preserve the value of such
assets (collectively, the “Receivership Estate”).
3.
On May 22, 2013, the Court entered an Order of Preliminary Injunction in this
Action (Doc. No. 22) (the “Preliminary Injunction”), creating a preliminary injunction and
confirming the appointment and the powers and duties of the Receiver, including the power to
initiate any actions or proceedings necessary to increase the value of the Receivership Estate.
4.
The Complaint alleges that, despite guaranteeing various returns on investments
in Defendants’ foreign currency trading venture, Defendants actually lost at least $1,000,000.00
overall in foreign currency trading and diverted a substantial portion of customers’ funds for
unauthorized or improper purposes.
5.
The Receiver’s investigation of Defendants’ books and records has indicated to
the Receiver that Defendants reported fictitious profits to customers and, rather than investing all
funds deposited by customers in foreign currency trading, misappropriated a substantial portion
of customer deposits in order to make payments to prior customers on fictitious “earnings,” in a
typical Ponzi scheme fashion.
6.
The Receiver has identified at least thirty (30) of Defendants’ customers who
received withdrawals / distributions from Defendants in excess of the amount of principal paid to
Defendants (“Net Winners”).
7.
The Receiver believes litigation appears necessary in order to recover amounts
owing to the Receivership Estate by several Net Winners.
2
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
(a)
the Motion (Doc. No. 89) is GRANTED;
(b)
Joseph W. Grier, III, of Grier Furr & Crisp, PA, is appointed receiver for the
assets of defendant, James Harvey Mason, and relief defendants, The JHM Forex Only
Pool (f/k/a The JHM Forex Only Pool, LP) and Forex Trading At Home, and the assets of
any subsidiaries or affiliates of Defendants, with the full powers of an equity receiver and
with the same powers and duties set forth more fully in the Preliminary Injunction; and
(c)
The Receiver is authorized, without additional confirmation by the Court, to
engage in any and all conduct necessary or appropriate to litigate any and all claims held
by the Receivership Estate against Net Winners.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 9, 2014
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?