Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bo-Cherry, Inc. d/b/a Bojangles

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Motion to Stay. This matter is hereby stayed/continued until the EEOCs funding is restored. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/1/2013. (eef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. BO-CHERRY, INC. d/b/a BOJANGLES, Defendant. ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. : 3:13-CV-00210-MOC-DSC ORDER Upon Motion and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that due to the lapse in appropriations for the EEOC that occurred on October 1, 2013 (“lapsed funding period”), the litigation of this matter is hereby STAYED/CONTINUED until the EEOC’s funding is restored. All pending deadlines in this matter that occur during the lapsed funding period will be extended for the same number of business days as are contained in the lapsed funding period. Further, Expert Reports pursuant to the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan [Document No. 7] and the Court’s Order Granting Joint Motion to Enlarge Discovery Period [Document No. 19] due on October 13, 2013 are hereby extended for a period of ten days, plus the amount of time that the lapsed funding period continues. If under this Order, any deadlines are required to be extended, the EEOC is directed to file a “Notice of Restoration of Funding and Extended Deadlines” with the Clerk of Court on the first business day after restoration of EEOC’s funding. Such notice shall indicate that funding has been restored to the EEOC and shall identify all deadlines that were affected under the provisions this Order, including for each item the original deadline and the extended deadline. 1 SO ORDERED. Signed: October 1, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?