Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bo-Cherry, Inc. d/b/a Bojangles
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Motion to Stay. This matter is hereby stayed/continued until the EEOCs funding is restored. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/1/2013. (eef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
BO-CHERRY, INC. d/b/a BOJANGLES,
Defendant.
____________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. :
3:13-CV-00210-MOC-DSC
ORDER
Upon Motion and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that due to the lapse in appropriations for the EEOC
that occurred on October 1, 2013 (“lapsed funding period”), the litigation of this matter is
hereby STAYED/CONTINUED until the EEOC’s funding is restored. All pending
deadlines in this matter that occur during the lapsed funding period will be extended for
the same number of business days as are contained in the lapsed funding period. Further,
Expert Reports pursuant to the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan [Document No.
7] and the Court’s Order Granting Joint Motion to Enlarge Discovery Period [Document
No. 19] due on October 13, 2013 are hereby extended for a period of ten days, plus the
amount of time that the lapsed funding period continues.
If under this Order, any deadlines are required to be extended, the EEOC is
directed to file a “Notice of Restoration of Funding and Extended Deadlines” with the
Clerk of Court on the first business day after restoration of EEOC’s funding. Such notice
shall indicate that funding has been restored to the EEOC and shall identify all deadlines
that were affected under the provisions this Order, including for each item the original
deadline and the extended deadline.
1
SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 1, 2013
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?