Chesney v. Colvin

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Remand to Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/26/2013. (tmg)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION RICKEY H. CHESNEY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 3:13-CV-00240-MOC Order Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will be directed to give Plaintiff an opportunity for a hearing; obtain additional evidence; and consider Plaintiff’s approval for Medicaid pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 416.912(b)(5) and Social Security Ruling (SSR) 06-03p. The ALJ will also further evaluate the mental impairments in accordance with the special technique described in 20 C.F.R. § 416.920a, documenting application of the technique in the decision by providing specific findings and appropriate rationale for each of the functional areas described in 20 C.F.R. § 416.920a(c). Additionally, the ALJ will reassess Plaintiff’s physical and mental Residual Functional Capacity pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 416.945 and SSRs 85-15, 85-16, and 968p, and consider and weigh all medical opinions pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 416.927(c). Therefore, this court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). The clerk of the court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed: November 26, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?