Andritz Hydro Corp. et al v. PPL Montana, LLC
Filing
17
ORDER denying as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying as moot 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/31/2013. (blf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-00412-RJC-DSC
ANDRITZ HYDRO CORP., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PPL MONTANA, LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on “PPL Montana, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for
Lack of Personal Jurisdiction” (document #6) and “PPL Montana, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss
Complaint Based on Tolling Agreement” (document #8) both filed July 19, 2013. This matter
was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs amendments to pleadings. Rule
15(a)(1) grants a party the right to “amend its pleading once as a matter of course,” if done
within twenty-one (21) days after serving the pleading, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), or, “if the
pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required,” a party may amend once as a matter
of course, provided that it does so within “21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21
days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a)(1)(B). The Rule further provides that “leave [to amend the pleadings] shall be freely given
where justice so requires.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a).
Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (document #15) on July 29, 2013, approximately
ten (10) days after receiving Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss. Therefore, it may amend its
pleading as a matter of course under Rule 15(a)(1)(B).
It is well settled that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and that
motions directed at superseded pleadings are to be denied as moot. Young v. City of Mount
Ranier, 238 F. 3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (amended pleading renders original pleading of no
effect); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motion to
dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
“PPL Montana, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction”
(document #6) is administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice.
2.
“PPL Montana, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Based on Tolling
Agreement” (document #8) is administratively DENIED as moot without
prejudice.
3.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties,
including but not limited to moving counsel; and to the Honorable Robert J.
Conrad, Jr..
SO ORDERED.
Signed: July 31, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?