Varney v. Mullisk et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying 27 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 28 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/7/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:13-cv-595-FDW LOWELL MASON VARNEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) FNU MULLISK, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, (Doc. No. 27), and on Plaintiff’s “Motion for Default Judgment” as to Defendant Uris Bennett, (Doc. No. 28). Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel is denied for the same reasons the Court has denied his previous motions to appoint counsel. See (Doc. No. 9). If the case proceeds to trial, the Court will revisit the issue of appointment of counsel. As for Plaintiff’s “Motion for Default Judgment,” Plaintiff notes that Defendant Bennett has not filed an Answer or otherwise responded to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The docket indicates that Bennett was served with summons on June 1, 2015. (Doc. No. 25). This Court entered an order dated August 19, 2015, giving the North Carolina Attorney General thirty days to inform the Court whether it intended to represent Bennett in this matter. (Doc. No. 26). The Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment at this time to allow the North Carolina Attorney General time to respond before entering default judgment.1 1 In any event, before this Court may grant a motion for default judgment, Plaintiff must first 1 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, (Doc. No. 27), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 28), are DENIED. file a motion for entry of default with the Clerk of this Court. See FED. R. CIV. P. 55. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?