Varney v. Mullisk et al

Filing 58

ORDER denying 53 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/26/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:13-cv-595-FDW
LOWELL MASON VARNEY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FNU MULLISK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery, (Doc.
No. 53). Plaintiff filed the motion to compel on February 4, 2016, stating that he submitted
interrogatories that were directed to various non-parties in this action, and that his interrogatories
have not been answered. Plaintiff’s motion to compel is denied, as Uris Bennett, the sole
remaining Defendant in this action, is not responsible for answering interrogatories directed to a
non-party.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery, (Doc.
No. 53), is DENIED.

1